Category: Footwear

March 19th, 2016 by Magandeep SINGH

Adidas ZG PureBoostGreat News! The shoe is in and well run in too. In short – it works. Lots of good stuff here but lots of old stuff here too. The preview note has been relegated to the bottom of this entry for it had some features already mentioned so no point repeating them.

That established, the ZG was a wondrous shoe. Straight out of the box it made me wonder what was so new about it? It looked a lot like the Ultra Boost. Sure the colour scheme was a bit different but same low-rise sock-like uppers, a generous boost foam sole teamed up with a grippy outer sole. Honestly, I couldn’t tell.

Well 50 kilometres later I can tell you my premonitions weren’t entirely unfounded. There is definitely a genetic link between the two styles but the ZG does two things better, or rather, different, than the Ultra. Firstly, it has more grippy uppers which means that although they fit like a sock, they hold the foot tighter. The middle section has these concentric bands of rubber which provide a structural spine that holds the shoe up and, in doing so, doesn’t let your foot collapse during a run either. The other thing the uppers help with is attracting less dust than the Ultra which meant my socks looked, well, a lot less dirty at the end of my sorties.

The second thing that the ZG manages to do is be light. It is exceptionally light, even with the leather-finished trims and a marbled heel support, and it is easy to take off in. The cushion does well to insulate the feet against injuries, the outer sole provides enough grip on the road and then some for light off-roading. The heel-to-toe drop is quite a bit but that’s almost standard in most shoes from the Boost line up with this level of cushion. The three reflective stripes on the front – camera stripes I call them as in a race they are the ones that will be easily captured by the lens, not the ones on the side – add a nice stylish touch: all in all a good all rounder.

Another point that separates this from the Ultra is that while the Ultra is more a unisex shoe (in build and shape) this is specifically designed for men, which means that there’s more toe room. The extra space may mean a hair’s width extra of a footprint on either side of the shoe, which can translate to better grip.

And finally, almost as a bonus, the shoe is seamlessly usable as an urban commute sneaker. The sombre uppers and tapered silhouette lend it well to pairing with jeans and shorts. The coloured sole adds just the right amount of sass without being too sporty. On my last work trip, I wore these to travel in and also used them for my runs which helped me bring down my travel shoe inventory by a factor of one which was a neat 25% reduction. Yes, I don’t travel shoe-light.

Again, like with the Ultra, this may not be the shoe you clock your PB in but it might just be the shoe that you get in all your training in to eventually shave those seconds off your standing track record.

As to how to choose between this and the Ultra, it could be a close call and it might come down to colour preferences and other such trivial details in which case Ultra would win hands down. But, even if ever so slightly, I prefer the ZG to the Ultra, if only for the added stability and grip that the shoe design provides.

PROS: Super cushioning and grip for training and long runs.

CONS: Generous cushion and high drop can reduce speed slightly. Could have come in more vibrant colours. Men don’t just like black!





There is always an inexplicable sense of excitement when a new running shoe makes a debut. It’s like suddenly one has new-found hope that maybe this will be the pair that shaves a minute off my Personal Best (PB). No? Well, never mind then…just enjoy that there is a new sneaker in town and it has a funky coloured sole.

For the rest of you who will find this launch a solid ‘boost’ (yes, I did that on purpose) to take them for a long slow spin on the weekend, well, even as you read this, the Adidas PureBoost ZG is ‘racing its way’ (sheesh, I really must stop!) to a store near you. ZG stands for “Zero Gravity” so definitely expect a light shoe here.

I am yet to try the shoe and it will be a good 50-odd kilometres before I mention anything about comfort and fit. For now, all I know is it has the same patented The Boost mid-layer cushioning. The cushion, if you have used other Adidas shoes provides a responsive cushion that’s bouncy without being squishy.

The knitted uppers remind a bit of the Ultra which was (is) quite a successful running shoe. The funky coloured stretch-web outer soles are a playful touch.

What does make this launch unique is that with the ZG, Adidas is focusing more on gender-centric running shoes. First it was the PureboostX for women and now this, which sort of completes the set. And both of these are completely different constructions ground up and not just a different colour palate that stereotypically define shoes for men and women.

So, come 19th March 2016, boys et a new toy to ogle over (INR11,999/-). Some stock shots follow. This is the black, white and red version. Another variant will be available in grey, white, and ‘solar slime’ (translation: shade of grey). And here are the hashtags in case you’re one of the privileged first few to acquire a pair. #PureBOOSTZG #adidasrunning


Adidas ZG Adidas ZG2 Adidas ZG3

Posted in Footwear, Style + Fitness

March 4th, 2016 by Magandeep SINGH

AdidasMuch remains to be said about that super cool urban sports brand, Adidas, which was somehow a latecomer on the running scene in India. Never mind the fact that they are behind some of the most formidable athletes and football teams (cricket too but I don’t care much for the game really) and yet in India, their running prowess has remained rather undermined.

I too didn’t know much about their range save for when they launched something called the ‘Boost’ a few years back and I got my hands on a jet black pair which oddly enough reminded me a lot of another running brand. The cushioning was more than ample, the grip firm yet yielding, and I enjoyed my runs in them, save for the fact that they fit tighter than similar sizes from other brands.

And then they somewhat faded into obscurity. relegated to the areas of my running cupboard from where things make rare comebacks. Till recently when I not only got to meet the team but also apprised myself of the range of running shoes that Adidas had launched since. In short, there were more than 2 dozen shoes and although all had the ‘Boost’ technology in some manner, they were entirely different from each other, with every style designed for a specific type of run. Here is my take on three of them.

But before I launch into shoe specifics, a bit about Boost. This is a proprietary foam which the brand has developed with BASF and the firm-yet-cushioning properties of this material are exemplary, or so the company believes, so much so that most new models incorporate a little or lot of this. The difference is in the thickness, the way it is applied (toe, heel, both) and the uppers it is used in tandem with.

Adidas Ultra BoostAdidas Ultra Boost: This is the running-on-a-bouncy-castle shoe. For those who are scared of injuries and knee-related issues, you couldn’t be more softly cushioned than in this pair. The Boost foam runs the length of the shoe, always generously layered, keeping a safe distance between you and the ground. The top is a close-fitting knitted sock with reinforcements to hold the laces. Overall, the shoe shows grip and comfort unparalleled. The fit is definitely snug but not constricting. The lacing is perhaps among the finest I have seen and holds well even through long runs. It is not a trail shoe so the grip although adequate for urban use, does wobble a bit when one goes off-track. finally, if there was one thing that I may not have entirely liked about the shoe it is that the excess cushion does take away some speed and control at high speed. So while it is nowhere near sluggish, it won’t be my shoe of choice of clocking my fastest 5k. That said, it is my favourite training shoe for long runs, especially when am running on tarmac or other hard surfaces. But all these knitted upper shoes not only get dirty, if it rains the slightest then the dirt gets down into your socks and shoes too. And then they need a good tumble in the machine (or a gentle hand-wash if you prefer) to get them back to presentable. I love the neon green uppers (was totally my colour for the season) but they definitely need their share of maintenance. PROS: Lovely cushion, great comfort, snug fit CONS: Some loss of speed.

Adidas Climachill Cosmic Boost: A step up from the Ultra Boost is the Cosmic Boost Adidas Cosmic Boostwith a roughly 8m heel-to-toe drop. This shoe currently has the most attractive colour-blocked options on the market. It also feels like it rides relatively higher around the ankle area so once laced in, the grip is substantial. Unlike the other Boosts, this shoe only has the Boost technology in the front half, the rear being a stretchweb rubber material. The overall effect is that the shoe transitions really well, from an impactful heel landing to a gentle roll unto toe-off. The Climachill ensures the feet stay cool and the knit uppers help with the circulation. Their is a small vertical groove running through the middle of the shoe insole right below the arch; the company claims this is to facilitate better airing but frankly, to me it was like an itch that doesn’t go away. I couldn’t help but feel that there was a stone in my shoe and the feeling lasted for entire runs. This perhaps is what made me not like the shoe as much but outside of that, this is a great middle-of-the-path shoe, one that provides ample cushioning and yet great control and speed. It also fared well at my last 25k trail run. PROS: Super attractive, Lovely mix of control and cushion, versatile trainer CONS: Insole groove is a nuisance.

Adidas Adizero Adios Boost 2: This is Adidas’ take on the old school run-flat style of shoes. Fairly light with a lean drop and a firm cushion, this is my go-to shoe for days when I just want to go fast. The infusion of Boost makes it a lot more forgiving than traditional EVA soles so it doubles up great as a long run shoe. Otherwise, for most parts, it remains a minimalist shoe without risking safety and shoe comfort. The mid-sole stiffness (Adidas famed Torsion system) improves energy transference, thereby Adidas Adizero Adios Boost 2making for a great return in every strike and every stride. This is where many a running brand parts ways as some believe that a sole should be utterly flexible whereas many wish for some stiffness to reduce the loss of energy thereby building up to a springy toe-off. I find myself preferring the latter so this shoe with its stiff middle sits well with me. The sole uses “Continental” (of tyre fame) rubber and that really comes in to play when rounding corners at a near-sprint without any loss of speed or form. The uppers are very classic in appearance (suede leather-like) but revisited with new-age materials that give it flexibility and also some hydrophobic advantage. The shoe runs low so do not expect a superior hug around the ankle area. It is definitely not you shoe for trails or anything off-piste but when it comes to grip, speed, spring, and control, few shoes can burn up tarmac like this one. PROS: Super shoe for speed and grip, great control CONS: None really; just a caveat: not a beginner running shoe.

And if that wasn’t jargon enough, here’s a list of some other terms that Adidas employs and what they mean. In many cases, the differences are tiny and not even the trained runners can tell what works better till they have tried it for a good 50 kms or so. (All the shoes, by the way, I have written about above were run in for a minimum of a 100 kms before being summed up here.)

Adidas Term-Chart

Click to enlarge

So which Boost is for you? Don’t worry, in the weeks to come am possibly going to add a couple more versions. If variety is the spice of life, prepare for one flavourful season…

Posted in Fitness Gear, Footwear, Style + Fitness Tagged with: , , ,

June 8th, 2015 by Magandeep SINGH

f4b209e600e167671ca305f758c5017dNike, the brand that pretty much created the concept of the running shoe, finally came around to saying that maybe it’s better barefoot. But to up and rubbish the idea of running shoes in its entirely wouldn’t have worked; it would amount to saying that all that you have believed in so far was wrong.

But before anybody thinks I am out to get Nike, I am not. For one, I have barely had this shoe for a while and have found a lot to love about it. That settled, let me get back to where I was.

So, for long, running shoes have come with cushions and gels, foams and rubber pads, multiple densities, various zones depending on impact and recoil, and more such technical malarkey. Some of it was relevant, some pure marketing. And this isn’t just Nike, everyone had been quick to jump on to the bandwagon.

But then this book happened, ‘Born to Run’ where the author, Christopher McDouggall spoke about how he went from being a sluggish runner with aches and pains to this ultra-running machine, all by going barefoot. But more than just a one-man narrative he backed it up with data and quotes, not to mention the astonishing feats of the Tarahumara tribe of Mexico who not only run barefoot but can also run endless. Their average race could last over a day and cover over 200 miles!d0d850e10824f7418f23010198020912

Now that sounds convincing enough. And it did manage to convince more than a few people in recent years to chuck the running shoe and go barefoot. So far so good. Nike saw potential and instead of dissing the whole idea went back to the R&D table and launched the Free series.

Free is constantly being upgraded and this year they have versions 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 – the cushioning increases with the numbers as also the drop (i.e. difference between heel and toe height). If you have no idea what barefoot running entails, go for 5.0, if you have been clocking miles on grass and dirt with nothing but your soles, you will enjoy 3.0. That said ,if you are curious about barefoot-ing it but have never tried it before, go for the 4.0, that way you get an idea without hurting yourself. The 5.0 are too close to standard running shoes. The ones reviewed here are the 3.0 the closest to barefoot running you will ever get, without well umm, being barefoot.

magan in nike free 3.0

Me & Nike Free 3.0

magan in nike free 3.0 2








That said, I am admittedly not a dedicated barefoot-er so my gait and stance were never meant for such shoes. And yet, without feeling much of a change to my stance I was able to shave off a good few seconds from my runs. So either I don’t have a specific stance or else I am adaptably amphibian like that.

But if you are not used to the feeling, then you might injure yourself with a heel-first strike; won’t happen instantly but the chances with each step would be higher. So don’t just get these out of the box and go on a long run as normal. Test the waters with shorter distances, and try them slower than your usual pace.

The uppers on this shoe are basically a sock, a lightweight Flyknit sock. I loved it, for not only does it manage to be firm and pliable at the same time, they are a cinch to pull on and in a recent triathlon event, they helped shave a good few precious seconds off the transition clock. You don’t necessarily need socks with these but keep running like that and the shoe may soon smell like a dirty old one!

Nike Free 3.0 sole

Hexagon grooves

The sole is a hexagonal interlocking pattern with deep grooves that allow each arc of the cells to move independently and in multiple directions. Mathematically speaking that is a lot of possible permutations for lateral movement but what it really translates to while running is that the sole relays the landing sensations to the body by mimicking the way a bare foot would have landed on the same surface. So big up for responsiveness even if it means heightened susceptibility to sprains and jerks. But gradually, one finds, that, as you learn to land with these, muscles and intuition take over and you start landing softer and in more measured a manner.Nike Free 3.0 Sole

Clearly this is not a shoe for the first-timer or weekend leisure runner. None of the benefits to be had from this pair are short-term. Keep going and go slow and you shall soon unbox their potential. Go fast and it’s a one way ticket to the physiotherapy clinic.

PROs: super-light, comfortable, responsive

CONs: stance-specific, low on support, uppers get dirty easily

3ec09f7283705e8e1ae91c80b19a486c 629b50ab7b6ba7674154034e13fb8991

Posted in , Fitness Gear, Footwear, Style + Fitness Tagged with: , , , ,

May 17th, 2015 by Magandeep SINGH
Skechers GoRun2

Skechers GoRun2

The king of the mid-strike sole was launched by Skechers in India quite sometime back and yet it remains one of my favourite launches of the time. Super-light, easy-to-pack, simplistic top design with a drastically different sole, the shoe was definitely something curious to look at. Coming from the brand that made those bum-enhancing shoes some years earlier (I must re-check this before Skechers sues me…nah!), no surprises that they would be the ones to deploy a new approach to an old sport.
The run quality is great, smooth easy ride, once (once) you get used to the idea of a mid-foot strike. This basically means that instead of hitting the ground with your heel (or with the ball of your toe when you run barefoot), this one is somewhat between the two. It does make for a slightly more jerky landing (for me) but the cushion in middle of the sole is thick was good enough to absorb the impact. However, in a half marathon, the impact over the long distance did give me some lower backache. But for anything upto 10kms, or a leisurely weekend run, this is pretty much the perfect shoe. One thing I would love to see in the newer versions, more colour options. The international site had a lot more exciting variety whereas what we got in India were a few rather boring combinations that made the shoes look a generation old even on being launched.

PROs: slick, low profile, lightweight, lovely mid-foot strike, grippy laces, fast!

CONs: not for long distances, less ankle support, jerky landing with heel strike, dull colours

Posted in Fitness Gear, Footwear, Style + Fitness Tagged with: , , ,

May 12th, 2015 by Magandeep SINGH

This is a collection of my running columns that have appeared in MW magazine, India’s leading men’s lifestyle publication. All reviews were based on first-hand trials (10kms for swimming, 200kms for cycling, and 100kms for running) and nothing is paid publicity. That said, if I have enjoyed a certain product more than average, it will certainly reflect in the stories.

Choosing a Running Shoe (Apr 2015) – Some advice on how to pick your first pair. Don’t worry if you hate it almost immediately; most of us do.

Importance of Patience (Feb 2015) – How training requires strength, stamina, dedication, and oodles of patience!

Getting Started (Jan 2015) – Tips on how to go from couch to coached!

Posted in Fitness Gear, Footwear, Printed Articles (PDFs), Style + Fitness, Sunglasses Tagged with: , , , ,

May 7th, 2015 by Magandeep SINGH

Pump it up!

The folks at Reebok have clearly been busy. When they went and redesigned their logo I was pretty sure that it was the beginning of the end, like when a girl breaks up with her beau and gets a new haircut in the hope that it will obliterate the agony of her loss.

But some girls get lucky and manage to upgrade. Reebok was then one such fortunate lass. The new Delta logo, the three sides of which embody the essence of social, mental and physical health (or well-being), has a deep philosophical undertone. But I don’t base my running gear decisions on “philosophical undertones”; instead I don it and take them for a good spin, a few many times, and by the end of it, I know whether it works for me or not.

So without missing a beat, this new power shoe definitely works for me. It revives

Pump it up!


something that Reebok now calls retro (the pump mechanism) but which was all the latest rage when I was in school. So clearly there was nostalgia. Then, it is based on the skeleton of the Z-series (that of the Z-tyre groove fame which made for slick fast running shoes) which has been a thoroughly enjoyable pair. And lastly, although it was loose and left too much room when put on, once you had the air in, they were as snug as a mouse in a shot glass.

Yes, please take a minute for that visual to settle.


Zrated sole = X factor… waah!

Moving on, the run is soft and controlled; it looks sleek and performs so. The sole has carefully appointed cushioning so that it’s soft and rigid in parts, as required. Good for mid-foot strikers but also heel runners. I managed some awesome road running – given the “Z” skeleton, that was expected – but it handled surprising well even when I went off-piste. The shoe rides high around the back of the foot therefore the ankle support envelops closely and protects against sprains.

The laces aren’t my favourite bit and I will look for a suitable replacement. Also, the high-walled tongue-less snug and sock-like design means that getting into the shoe in the morning will burn a good few calories even before you hit the road!

But the only real fear is that if the Zpump stops working or starts leaking, you are basically going to feel like a duck in a marathon, or a scuba diver with his flippers on! But so far am assured it won’t happen. Mine are holding well in spite of a good few kilometres on them.

All said and done, it is a refreshing release from what many perceive to be NOT a core running brand. Price is a concern, especially if you wear out your trainers every few months. But the good bit is that in spite of all the doohickey they look pleasantly social enough for a night about town without needing you to change into urban sneakers. So maybe, that versatility could be viewed as a potential saving…

But why Zpump? Sounds like a Frenchman saying “The Pump”… ze pump eez goood, as ewe will zee… n’est-ce pas? I am almost embarrassed to even say it in public. “The Pump” is way cooler.


Zpump Fusion INR14,999/- only!

PROS: customisable snug fit, good ankle and mid-foot support, medium-intensity cushion for zippy races and long workouts, lovely colour combos.

CONS: putting them on is a wrestle, laces not grippy and kept coming undone, the pump sometimes doesn’t inflate with a squeeze so you have to feel for the air cushion expanding, price(!)

Posted in Fitness Gear, Footwear Tagged with: , , ,

June 4th, 2014 by Magandeep SINGH


So, I must confess that I have owned various Nike models on earlier occasions (Free 3.0, Lunarknit, Pegasus 28) and barring the Pegasus, I have never enjoyed the running experience in them. For one, their full sizes never fit me well and on most runs over 15k, I ended up with blackened toenails. So when the PR team sent over this pair and told me this was pretty much the last word in distance running, I knew I had to try these on, even if just to reassert that Nike is not all that it is made out to be.
The shoe, out of the box, was the lightest thing I had ever held, definitely the lightest I had ever come across. The top is a stiff fabric mesh that runs along the contours of the foot making for a sleek silhouette. The top on this pair was a mix of white, black and fluorescent green and it looked really good. Looked rather professional too. It was the kind of look that you wouldn’t want to be in this shoe and then run a 2-hour plus half marathon; it would show you up for someone who doesn’t deserve it. And that’s just going by looks!
The sole is a light layers of foam-like substance and although semi-hard to touch, is pretty flexible. What surprised me was that the shoe in spite of being one of the pricier options as far as running gear goes, did not accommodate for the Nike+ chip. This may have been because the chip would make the mid-sole a tad stiff but I know that the Free range is compatible with this technology. I don’t know if I liked it or not for the Nike iPhone app had been a primary influencer in my previous purchases. Inasmuch as I was impressed by the look and feel, I was still a tad disappointed, for, apart from the weight, the shoe seemed to be rather ‘simple’.
Finally, the run. Being light, it feels like next to nothing. You almost forget they are there. A caveat though, don’t lace them too tight for what feels snug in the beginning can turn constricting and painful later. They don’t come off and hold the foot well in place even when not tightened excessively.
The run quality was great; the shoe gave me both control and speed – I went faster and felt nimble on my feet even after a good few 2km-laps. I was trying the shoe on my usual track+trail mix and the shoe handled bother fairly well. While on the road the stiffness helped give a lovely bounce back, quite literally putting a spring in my stride, on the tracks the shoe remained stable enough to avoid any ankle stress. It did get dirty very easily in the dirt though. A few runs on, the shoe looks old and nothing like the shiny new beauty I had extracted from the pack.
The size remains a concern and I wish I could have had a half size bigger but with a lighter pair of socks I can just about get it right. But I would think twice before attempting an endurance run in these. But, mind you, the shoe does say the words “Road” and “Racing” in rather bold lettering on the inside so, in case I missed that…
All in all, a great shoe, in fact a landmark shoe for me, considering how it took Nike from being an avoidable brand to a seriously enjoyable one.

Posted in Fitness Gear, Footwear, Style + Fitness Tagged with: , , ,